Catégories
|
BDSP5 > Prévention santé > Réglementation préventive > Taxe produit
Taxe produitSynonyme(s)Taxe sur produitVoir aussi |
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (94)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
Visionner les documents numériques
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Article : Fascicule
L. TROY, Auteur |Ce dossier se penche sur la prévalence du surpoids et de l’obésité en Europe et sur les politiques publiques de prévention mises en place dans différents pays. En Europe, près de la moitié de la population est en surpoids ou obèse, avec des disp[...]
Document de travail
R. TCHERNIS ; K.F. TELTSER ; A. TEOTIA ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2022Smoking and obesity are the two leading causes of preventable deaths in the United States. Because smoking is subject to heavy government intervention, understanding the effect of smoking on obesity is important in determining the extent of unin[...]
Document de travail
R. HAI ; J.J. HECKMAN ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2022We develop and estimate a life-cycle model in a rational addiction framework where youth choose to smoke, attend school, work part-time, and consume while facing borrowing constraints. The model features multiple channels for studying the recipr[...]
Document de travail
H. SAFFER ; M. GEHRSITZ ; M. GROSSMAN ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2022The alcohol industry argues that alcohol excise taxes do not reduce heavy drinking because of substitutions to lower-cost products and that these taxes disproportionately burden low-income drinkers. Alternatively, some economists have argued tha[...]
Ouvrage
Alcohol use and its burden constitute one of the largest public health challenges in the WHO European Region. Raising alcohol taxes is a cost-effective “best buy” measure to reduce alcohol consumption, but its implementation remains uneven. This[...]
Document de travail
A.I. FRIEDSON ; M. LI ; D.I. REES ; et al. ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2021Medical experts have argued forcefully that using cigarettes harms health, prompting the adoption of myriad anti-smoking policies. The association between smoking and mortality may, however, be driven by unobserved factors, making it difficult t[...]
Document de travail
A.I. FRIEDSON ; M. LI ; K. MECKEL ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2021Are teenage and adult smoking causally related? Recent anti-tobacco policy is predicated on the assumption that preventing teenagers from smoking will ensure that fewer adults smoke, but direct evidence in support of this assumption is scant. Us[...]
Document de travail
R. ABOUK ; C.J. COURTEMANCHE ; D.M. DAVE ; et al. ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2021Over the past decade, rising youth use of e-cigarettes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) has prompted aggressive regulation by state and local governments. Between 2010 and 2019, ten states and two large counties adopted ENDS[...]
Document de travail
J. CAWLEY ; M.R. DALY ; R. THORNTON ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2021Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are relatively new and there is little evidence about their impact on SSB consumption or body mass index (as opposed to prices, purchases, or sales), their impact on youth (as opposed to on adults), or t[...]
Document de travail
J.P. NEWHOUSE ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2020I look at prevention through an economic lens and make three main points. First, those advocating preventive measures are often asked how much money a given measure saves. This question is misguided. Rather preventive measures can be thought of [...]
Document de travail
M. DARDEN ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2020In 1956, 52% of urban men and 42% of rural men smoked cigarettes. By 2010, the disparity had flipped: 24.7% of urban men and 30.6% of rural men smoked. Smoking remains the greatest preventable cause of mortality in the United States, and underst[...]
Document de travail
H. ALLCOTT ; C. RAFKIN ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2020We model optimal e-cigarette regulation and estimate key sufficient statistics. Using tax changes and scanner data, we estimate relatively elastic demand and limited substitution between e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. In sample surveys[...]
Document de travail
P. DECICCA ; D.S. KENKEL ; M.F. LOVENHEIM ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2020Tobacco regulation has been a major component of health policy in the developed world since the UK’s Royal College of Physicians’ and the U.S. Surgeon General’s reports in the 1960s. Such regulation, which has intensified in the past two decades[...]
Document de travail
M. GEHRSITZ ; H. SAFFER ; M. GROSSMAN ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2020We show that tax-induced increases in alcohol prices can lead to substantial substitution and avoidance behavior that limits reductions in alcohol consumption. Causal estimates are derived from a natural experiment in Illinois where spirits and [...]
Document de travail
C.D. COTTI ; C.J. COURTEMANCHE ; J.C. MACLEAN ; et al. ; National Bureau of Economic Research. (N.B.E.R.). Cambridge CA. USA | Cambridge : N.B.E.R. | 2020We explore the effect of e-cigarette taxes enacted in eight states and two large counties on e-cigarette prices, e-cigarette sales, and sales of other tobacco products. We use the Nielsen Retail Scanner data from 2011 to 2017, comprising approxi[...]
